Yet, the paper argues that the text is not simply a moral tract. By making the punishment excessive and the knight’s repentance perfunctory, the author satirizes the Counter-Reformation’s obsession with sexual sin. The true sin of Dom Fernando, the text implies, is not lust but stupidity—a failure to read social reality correctly. This secular undercurrent suggests a proto-Enlightenment skepticism.
The chivalric genre traditionally celebrates amor cortês (courtly love) as a sublimated, ennobling force. The knight’s quest is directed towards spiritual or patriotic ends, with desire for a lady serving as a distant, platonic engine. O Cavaleiro Lascivo inverts this paradigm. The manuscript, attributed speculatively to an anonymous author possibly associated with the Portuguese Segunda Escolástica , presents Dom Fernando de Montemor, a knight whose journeys across the Alentejo and into Castile are catalyzed not by honor or faith, but by an insatiable, often comically disastrous, lust. O Cavaleiro Lascivo
The late 16th century in the Iberian Peninsula was a period of intense moral regulation under the Tridentine reforms. The Portuguese Inquisition, active from 1536, scrutinized texts for doctrinal deviance. Simultaneously, the picaresque novel, exemplified by Lazarillo de Tormes (1554), had introduced a realist, cynical gaze into literature. Yet, the paper argues that the text is
The text unfolds over twelve aventuras . In the first three, Dom Fernando attempts to rescue a “damsel in distress” (Dona Leonor), only to discover that she has engineered her own abduction to escape a loveless marriage. His lascivious advance is met with a public whipping by her maidservants. O Cavaleiro Lascivo inverts this paradigm
This paper contends that the work is a deliberate anti-romance. By replacing the chaste Beatrice with a series of unattainable or deceptive objects of desire, the author deconstructs the very notion of chivalric transcendence.