But is the 1998 film really a bad monster movie , or is it simply a bad Godzilla movie ? Let’s take an objective look back at the film that tried—and largely failed—to bring the King of the Monsters to the West. The idea of an American Godzilla film was a development hell classic. For over a decade, studios like Columbia TriStar (Sony) tried to get a version off the ground, with directors like Jan de Bont ( Speed ) attached at various points. De Bont’s version, which never got made, allegedly featured a more traditional, ray-breathing Godzilla fighting a giant monster called "The Gryphon."
What do you think? Does the 1998 Godzilla deserve its bad reputation, or is it unfairly hated? Let me know in the comments. Godzilla -1998-
So grab some popcorn, turn off your inner fanboy, and enjoy it for what it is: the most expensive B-movie ever made. Just don’t call it Godzilla in front of a Toho executive. 2/5 Rating (as a cheesy 90s blockbuster): 4/5 But is the 1998 film really a bad
In their 2004 film Godzilla: Final Wars , they included a scene where the "American Godzilla" (officially renamed ) attacks Sydney, Australia. The real Godzilla shows up, kills Zilla with a single blast of atomic breath, and destroys the Sydney Opera House in the process. The Japanese characters then remark: "I knew it. That thing wasn't Godzilla. It was just a lizard." For over a decade, studios like Columbia TriStar